| |
"Remembering Without Taking
Away: World War II and the Holocaust in Polish and Jewish
Collective Memories."
By: Bart Bonikowski
November 6, 2003
Congregation Habonim, Toronto
"Good evening ladies and
gentlemen. I am incredibly honoured to be here tonight,
as I was honoured to be at the March of Remembrance and
Hope earlier this summer. That experience affected me in
a profound manner. I know that its impact will stay with
me for years to come.
The most transformative moments of my trip were those spent
with people who endured the horrors of the Holocaust. The
survivors' passion and drive were unlike those I've ever
encountered in any other human beings. When my fellow participants
and I would get tired after a long day and would begin complaining
about the heat or the pain in our legs, these people pressed
on; they marched on without stopping. Without the slightest
sign of fatigue, they shared with us deeply personal stories
with universal implications about human suffering, perseverance,
and heroism.
My initial intention was to come here and tell you about
those universal human messages. However, as I thought about
the title of this evening's gathering - "The Holocaust
Through the Eyes of Others" - I realised that I needed
to readjust my vision and talk about my experience from
my unique perspective as a Pole living in Canada. I know
that this will not be easy - after all, Polish-Jewish relations
have been far from harmonious throughout history.
I'll start by telling you a very brief story. A few months
after returning from the March of Remembrance and Hope,
I went out for dinner with a few friends, one of whom is
Jewish. As we talked over dinner, someone at the table mentioned
his childhood memories of being a scout. When I replied
that I too was a scout in Poland as a young kid, my Jewish
friend turned to me and asked: "Oh really? Did they
teach you how to cremate?" Since I had never before
been the target of such hurtful comments, I was at a loss
for words. I immediately thought of the people who figure
in my family history: my great-uncle, a Righteous Among
the Nations, who saved the lives of Jews; another great-uncle,
Stanislaw, who died after years of torture at the hands
of the Nazis; and others who didn't save the lives of Jews
directly, but who fought in the Polish Army trying to diminish
the power of the Nazis. I also thought of the three million
non-Jewish Poles who lost their lives during World War II,
some on the fronts, some in camps, some in the bombing of
cities. My friend's words stung deeply.
Once I regained my composure, I rationalised the situation
by telling myself that my friend, who is a genuinely good
person, meant no harm. Yet, I could not stop thinking about
the possible underlying causes of her comment. I came to
the conclusion that her words had less to do with maliciousness
than with a specific interpretation of history. Perhaps
her perspective was influenced by a history of violence
or hatred experienced by her family at the hands of Poles.
After all, such acts form an unquestionable part of Poland's
history. But how are we to think about anti-Jewish violence
or hatred in the context of Poland's historical role as
the heart of Jewish culture; in the context of generations
of Polish kids who have grown up on literature written by
Jewish Poles, like Brzechwa, Tuwim, Slonimski, and Singer;
in the context of Poland as the only country in Europe where
tolerance made it possible for Jews to settle in large numbers;
in the context of Poland as the only country in the world
where hiding a Jew carried an automatic death sentence for
one's entire family, a fact that did not preclude many Poles
form saving Jewish lives, resulting in the highest number
of Righteous Among the Nations? It occurred to me that what
we need is a way of thinking historically without taking
away from the memory of others.
To illustrate my point, let me provide an example of a frequent
reaction of Poles to charges of anti-Semitism. The typical
response to such charges consists of dismissive rebuttals
such as, "Well, you know what? Anti-Semitism was worse
elsewhere," or "It's actually the other way around:
Jews hate Poles more than we hate them." Clearly, these
are unacceptable answers. Certainly, anti-Semitism has existed
elsewhere, but its precise extent is difficult to ascertain.
And even if such statistics existed, the relative magnitude
of anti-Semitic tendencies is really inconsequential. What
matters is the unquestionable fact that Jews experienced
anti-Semitism in Poland. The memory of their pain and suffering
must not be diminished. The defensive answers presented
by many Poles in fact take away from the history of the
Jewish people.
In the same vein, to say that Poles are anti-Semites or
that Polish scouts are adept at cremation is to perform
the same operation, merely in reverse. Discussions of Polish
anti-Semitism must not take away from Polish heroism, suffering,
and genocide, much as discussions of Jewish history must
not take away from Jewish heroism, suffering, and the Holocaust.
And let me make one thing clear: the Holocaust and Polish
suffering are not one and the same thing. Poland was a nation
state attacked by Germany, a foreign power. As such, it
had the means to fight back; it had a national army. The
Jewish people did not. Instead, the Jewish people were bound
for extermination solely by virtue of their ethnicity. The
Holocaust and World War II are two different, though clearly
related, historical events.
So how are we to proceed? How are we to reconcile these
difficult issues? What I want to argue for is a more complex
understanding of the past; for a discourse that does not
take away. The suffering of a people, of any people, is
a holy part of their heritage and critical discussions must
not infringe on this fundamental right to collective memory.
What can complex thinking about history accomplish? For
one, perhaps it can begin mending the rifts between the
Jewish and Polish communities. The memories of our two peoples
are not mutually exclusive - we can respectfully remember
and talk about them both. Complex thinking of the past can
also allow us to talk about other tragedies in a constructive
manner. Thus, discussions of the Holocaust should not take
away from the Rwandan genocide and vice versa. Deaths of
thousands, let alone millions, are not comparable, for scale
loses meaning in reference to mass murder.
If such a mode of thought is to succeed, we must emphasise
the fact that the Holocaust is a sacred memory of the Jewish
people. My trip to Poland helped me come into visceral contact
with unspeakable horrors, horrors that I had previously
only read about: six million innocent men, women, and children
brutally murdered, tortured, humiliated. No one has suffered
in the same way as the Jewish people and I sincerely hope
that no one ever will. And no one has the right to violate
the sacred memory of this tragedy.
Is a more complex understanding of history difficult? Most
certainly. After all, these are highly emotionally charged
topics. Moreover, historical events are inherently contentious.
There simply is no clear path to achieving mutual respect.
However, try we must, because only by complicating history
and learning to not take away can we fulfil our human duty
of learning from the tragedies of past generations. And
I believe that hope exists. I experienced it during the
March. There were many occasions during our time in Poland
when we felt completely helpless. How could we possibly
talk about social change and the prevention of future violence
at the same time as we were confronted with images of horror,
of brutal murder on an unimaginable scale?
Yet, just as we experienced moments of despair and hopelessness,
we also experienced moments of optimism. One such moment,
which left a particularly lasting impression on me, took
place at the closing ceremony in Birkenau. Against the backdrop
of barbed wire fences and ruins of crematoria, the survivors
were getting ready to light the candles for Kaddish. Each
stepped forward and read out the names of his or her family
members who perished at the hands of the Nazis. One woman
approached the microphone but was unable to speak. She stood
in front of us and cried. Another survivor came up to her
and said, "Wait, don't cry. Look! Look at them! They
are here for you!" She was right. I looked around me
and I realised that with me were hundreds of young people
who wanted to learn, who wanted to remember, who wanted
to prevent things like this from happening in the future.
I gained hope by listening to them and by sharing with them
my own fears and insecurities. I came to realise that this
is the only route to hope. We must listen; we must welcome
opportunities to become exposed to other cultures and to
other peoples; and we must educate each other. Hope can
only be realised through mutual understanding. Only through
such an understanding can we promote knowledge and diminish
hatred. And then maybe, just maybe, will we be able to say
"never again"."
|
|